Determination represents the Interpretation and Evaluation of the Consequence of the Condition, state or entity, as definition, which would indicate what it is, how it should be treated, what or what not it can be used for, and whether or not it can be transformed or destroyed. By definition the good must be preserved and the bad destroyed, where these qualities are interpretations and evaluations. [sp]

Absent Determinant:

The Absent Determinant is the absence of any known comparative physical reality, or any provable non-physical reality, equivalent to the earth's planetary living Condition as Comparative Standards, in which to compare, qualities, conditions and dynamics by degrees of similarity or distinction, that would indicate the reason, purpose, motive, meaning and Consequence of Being, of any or all elements of the natural world. The best way to study one civilization is to study many civilizations through the auspices of the study of history. This absence of comparative determinatives essentially means anyone is free to believe anything, as free-for-all or complete free-will.


Since there is only one known planetary Condition containing life, the means of Determination can only be by distinctions of change, as pre-existent Condition compared to changed Condition, or whether a changed Condition is better or worse than the Condition previous. The Internet is better than no Internet or vice versa. This is a present Condition compared to the memory of a previous Condition. Change is defined as results and products produced as changed conditions, both internal or external to any given Delineated Entity. The Consequence of any given Delineated Entity is determined by the results and products it produces both internal and external to itself as change. Good health may be the result of ingesting good food, but problems with health were a result of too much carousing. [sp]


Fundamental to the dynamics of the definition of change is said to be the concepts of the Part as an individual Delineated Entity, and the Whole as a collection of Parts, both of which are the genisis and monitors of change. Every Whole is a Part and every Part is a Whole described as circumscribed domain, composed of numerically limited multiplicity of elements or Parts, which comprise a Unified Function in conjunction with each other. Every member of the chorus is to sing in harmony with each other. The difference between the Whole and the Part is said to be that the Part produces change as products external to itself. The farmer grows bean and is called a bean farmer. The Whole is said to produce products internal to itself. The farmer's market is a collection of individual farmers selling their produce. [sp]

Change as evaluated from the internality of the Whole is said to be called Constant, which is change as the continuous preservation and duplication of Condition in near exact likeness, and thus the Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Constant. The tree conforms to the forest. Change as evaluated from the externality of the Part is Constant when conforming to the Whole, and is called Random when it is some degree of derivation from Constant and thus the Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Random or the exception. The standard of comparison is what is unusual and exceptional. [sp]


From the concepts of the Whole and the Part are said to derive the Conservative and Progressive Paradigms, as the the fundamental ruling Philosophys and Psychologys, of human consciousness and culture, to which all organized society conforms and functions, as Progressive development and Conservative natural continuity. [sp]

Progressive Paradigm:

The Progressive Paradigm is based on the concept of Finite Determination, which coincides with the dynamics of the Part. The results and products as altered states of any given entity defines and explains the activity and behavior of change, as external and by function: the reason, purpose and Consequence of the entity producing the change. The product produced by the hydroelectric plant explains its existence and Consequence. Thus everything is interpreted and evaluated by what it does and produces and what is possessed as a result. Social class is primarily determined by what people produce and have as a result. [sp]

Comparative Polarities:

The concept of Finite Determination, wherein valid Consequence is determined by products produced external as progressive development, creates a Context of antithetical Comparative Polarities. Entities which do not produce progressive development are considered to possess no Consequence because they produce no products deemed to be of worth, and of which consequential change as distinct and better can be assessed. Indigenous people who do not engage in excess and profit are generally defined as of little worth. Antithetical Consequence also solves the problem of the necessity of resource, which ascribes what is needed as no matter. [sp]

Choate Whole:

The root of Comparative Polarities is said to descend from the concept of the Choate Whole, which is defined as producing no consequential results and products external, and thus its Consequence cannot be explained by comparison to what it produces external to itself. The planet earth is called a Choate Whole, producing no discernable products external to itself which explains its existence. Thus by the definition of Finite Determination, it would have no Consequence in and ot itself called Consequential Negation. [sp]

Since there is no external product to explain the existence of a Choate Whole, the explanation must come from within, wherein the Whole is explained by the Part. A specific Part within a Whole, by the products it produces external to itself, as superior, exceptional, refined, premium and meritorious, explains the Whole as Unified Function, the purpose of which is to support the distinct product produced by that specific Part. The purpose of the universe is to create and support the crown of creation, the human being as exceptional from all other known beings. This is superior elite development and refinement as exhibited especially by the aristocracies of monarchy, for which the commoners as the Whole, are to admire, emulate, respect and serve. [sp]

Conservative Paradigm:

The Conservative Paradigm is based on the concept of Existent Determination, which coincides with the dynamics of the Whole, as a collection of Parts that create results and products internal to itself. The collection of Parts of a living body in unison produces the internal construct a living organism. All Parts in a Whole are equal to the existence of the Whole as a Delineated Entity, and thus are each equally necessary. Products internal mean change which essentially duplicates and preserves the existing structure as a collection necessary to the continuance of the Whole. Individuality weakens the existing structure by failing to perform its part as integral to the entire structure. Change proceeding from within is called duplication. Team sports are based upon specified rules which cannot be changed willy-nilly without changing the essence of the game. [sp]

The definition of Conservative would be said to mean the Whole explains the Part. The Whole explains the Part as a collection of affinitive entities, which act in Unified Function to comprise the internal domain of a Delineated Entity, which may be a Choate Whole in and of itself, or may as producing products external to itself in service of a greater Whole be also a Part. Any organic body explains the existence and function of all its component Parts, such as heart and lungs. The earth as a Choate Whole might be explained as every Part of which it is composed, is the infinite existence of a material and living organism producing at least Cognizance. [sp]


The Psychological aspect of the Whole and the Part is introduced primarily through group dynamics, as the individual representing the Part, and group encounters representing the Whole, and which become subconscious aspects of a person's psychology. [sp]

Psychology represents the concept of Context, as the Interpretation and Evaluation of Consequence through memory and mind of Condition as the physical world. Interpretation and Evaluation are said to be the province of three interpretive agencies, called Ego, Identities and Ipseities. [sp]

The Ego is said to be the interpreter and evaluator of Condition, as the selector of Association specifically confined and relevant to the body, both internal and external. The interpretive function of the Ego as specific to the body, is likened to the Whole as a Delineated Entity, complete in itself as conforming to its environment. [sp]

The Identities are constructs of the mind which act as elucidations of Context through the auspices of Interpretive Context and Interpretive Personifications created for the purpose of accomplishing objectives in the external world. Identities are likened to the Part as constructed to produce primarily products external to themselves. [sp]


The Ipseities are said to be Identities which represent other-dimensional context and personification, primarily for the purpose of attempting to understand or influence the present and future by non-physical means. Ipseities may be representative of the interpretation of Spiritual manifestations, as direct experience in the environment, to which the individual creates one or more identities as interpreters and evaluators called Ipseities. Ipseities may be representative of Religious ideals and characterizations such as saints, angels or perfected masters, which are generally adopted as learning and education vicarious to real experience. Metaphysical Ipseities are representative of the self, as exhibiting the powers and influence of said non-physical entities and forces as direct or instrumental. [sp]


The Ego is called the selector of Association, as interpreter and evaluator of all sensory appreciation, pertaining specifically to that Consequence which affects the body, either by direct experience or as Association pertaining to bodily experience both external and internal. The body as an existing constitution is the determinate for Consequence, where its internal function as Constant is paramount. [sp]

Internal Authority:

The determination of Consequence, wherein the Selector of Association as the Ego, is primarily concerned with affects that pertain to the body is called Internal Authority. The mandates for the selection of Association applied to any given subject, in reality or mind, would be associated from Context internal to the self, self-experience and self-determination of the body as interpreted and evaluated by the Ego as the monitor of the body. Internal Authority is said to parallel the dynamics of the Whole, wherein the Unified Function of all the bodily Parts work in harmonious fashion to promote the best well-being internal to the body. The Ego would not be in favor of the selection of agendas independent of the true Condition of the body as for instance driving race cars. [sp]

Optimum Correspondence:

Determinations of the Ego are said to primarily be made utilizing the Evaluative System called Optimum Correspondence. The body is called Constant, which means the parameters of its constitution are fairly defined, definitive, stable and fixed, while the external domain of which it exists is called Random, meaning unpredictably changeable to which the body must be adjusted in conformance. Consequential determination of the Ego means the assessment of Consequence primarily external to the body, which is subject to continuous change as compared to the fairly specific standards of the body as Comparative Base. One corresponds one's dress to weather conditions based on the comfort of the body. [sp]


The nature and dynamic of the body is called Conservative, meaning that the dynamic of its construct requires the Ego as the associational selector, to maintain the body in same or similar conditions as dictated by the parameters of its environment, as correlates to the function of the body as a Whole, as to preserve the best workings of all its internal Parts. [sp]


The body is both a Whole and a Part called a Controversal. Every or any given element is a Whole in and of itself having Parts contained within, and any given Whole is a Part in and of itself, as a single element contained within a larger Whole. The body is a Whole in and of itself, and at the same a Part of a larger surrounding environment as a greater Whole. The body as a Whole in and of itself and as such Conservative, means the Ego must conform the internal body as a Constant, to proper maintenance such that it maintains its integrity of composition. A primary aspect of the body as a Part, is the concept of the Identities, the purpose of which is to produce artifacts external to the self. [sp]


In contrast to the Ego as a singular interpretive context representing one body, are what are called Identities, which represent the possible creation of multiple personalities and characterizations that generally act as creators of change. Identities take the form of belief, ways of doing things, possessions, class, affiliations, professions, duties and a host of other ambitions. The Identities as personifications are the determinates for Consequence each as applying to the particular context of conviction and behavior. [sp]

External Authority:

The determination of Consequence, wherein the Selector of Association is Identities, means interpretation and evaluation from contexts, as producing results and products as envisaged by the mind, usually external to immediate present necessity, as agendas which may be independent of the Ego. Identities are called External Authority, because they are usually based on information and knowledge obtained vicarious to the actual experience of the body and Ego, through word of mouth, books, education, media, or any manner not of actual self-experience. External Authorities are the acceptance of dictates for thinking, activity and behavior from sources other than oneself and one's self-experience. Identities may be based on personifications as completely unnecessary and unrelated to the Ego, like radio announcer, long distance runner, locksmith or dentist. The Identities are likened to the function of the Part, the purpose of which is to produce results and products external to the producer. [sp]


Identities can be Conservative or Progressive as parallel the dynamics of the Whole or the Part. Identities are creations of the mind and do not necessarily have to be representative of reality in any way whatsoever, and thus they can correspond and be affinitive to existing external conditions, or they can be representative of any sort of created reality possible. When Conservative, Identities can be thought of as corresponding to the dynamics of the Whole, products produced are primarily maintenance as preserving existing conditions internal to the social, cultural and community milieu in a same or similar manner. In political terms this can be called Socialism. [sp]

Progressive Identities can be called Individualist as conforming to the dynamics of the Part. The Part is called Progressive when it produces products external to itself, which alters the state in which the Part exists, so as to better correspond the Whole to itself. Principles of Individualism would represent the Part as independent of the Whole, and especially where the Part represent an elite function to which the Whole should serve and opposed to the Part serving the Whole. [sp]

Dyadic Authoritative Comparative:

If products produced explains the time, energy and effort to produce them as superior to pre-existent conditions, a bipolar evaluative conflict ensues between pre-existent and changed states, and wherein change as distinct explains activity and behavior. Since products produced require resource from already existent conditions a further conflict is the result requiring a bipolar Evaluative System called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. [sp]

The system is based on negative and positive Comparative Base, as Antithetical Opposites. Consequence is assessed from the negative, generally defined as anything natural, as Additory Base to which Consequence is assessed as more than by comparison. Consequence is assessed from the positive, generally defined as ideal development, as Subtractive Base to which Consequence is assessed by comparison as less than. [sp]


The term Ipseity represents selectors of Association, as conceptually created Identities, created in the mind by the Ego for the purpose of the Interpretation and Evaluation of assessed non-physical and other-dimensional Contexts. These are called Spiritual, Religious and Meta Ipseities. [sp]

Spiritual Ipseities:

Spiritual Ipseities are based on Internal Authority of the Whole. When the Whole is the function and purpose of the Part, the Part serves the Whole and the Whole is God. God as a Whole, is everything within itself, as all of its Parts. Every Part is God and every God is Part. This would represent the logic of the Polytheism in reference to the concepts of the Whole and the Part. [sp]

Spiritual Ipseities are defined as interpretive and evaluative contexts and personifications of sensory impressions directly experienced by the individual from the environment, as manifestations considered to be of other-dimensional phenomenon, as Internal Authority or personal experience, as instanced by the Intercession of other-dimensional manifestations. If the natural world is considered a Choate Whole, wherein its primary function is to produce products internal to itself, spiritual entities and manifestations may be considered as internal to the condition and subject to the appreciation of human sensory experience. [sp]

Religious Ipseities:

Religious Ipseities are based on External Authority of the Part. When the Part is the function and purpose of the Whole, the Whole serves the Part and the Part is God. God as a Part is everything within itself, and what God produces external to itself as the function of the Part. God is a single Part in an ungodly Whole as Monotheistic entity which produces and affects Godliness external to itself. Monotheism is the superior Part of an inferior Whole. [sp]

Religious Ipseities are defined as icons, image and word, as mandates for thought and behavior based on the External Authority, where the sources of conception is external to the individual, as organized religious instruction and education by others. These conceptions are generally based on theological systems where the natural world is rejected as a Choate Whole, and a conceptual replacement is necessary. God represents a superior Part of an inferior Whole, to which the individual is to conform and in the manner ot the Part produce Godly works. [sp]

Meta Ipseities:

Meta Ipseities are Identities created by the Ego for the purpose of the Interpretation and Evaluation of what is interpreted as non-physical and other-dimensional Contexts, but wherein Interpretive Context is outside the duality of Antithetical Opposition and is interpreted as Complimentary Opposition, as an intellectual Determination. [sp]

Meta Ipsieties may be developed into contexts for Interpretation which are outside both the Positive and Negative Dimensions, as matter and mind or out-of-body Cognizance. This is similar to the concept of the Watcher, as self-conscious remembering observation, which becomes unconscious and automatic over time, and not the out-of-body experience of what is called astral projection. [sp]

Metpaphysical Determination:

Metaphysical Ipseity:

The Metaphysical Ipseity is a Meta Ipseity as possessed of Enigmatic Belief, in which the Context for Interpretation is at the same time One and All, or the individual at the same time believes in the ability to be One as Somatic Being, wherein the individual must believe in the reality of the Sentient Self as limited, singular experience; and at the same time All, as the Psychesoma or the belief in the reality of the Second Self as unlimited, multible, all and everything.

Memory as events, circumstance or situation as encapsulated into elements, as can be compared with any other element of memory, in any given instance as mix and match. Elements of memory are removed from the contexts of events, circumstance or situation and thus one can compare any one or more to any other one or more elements of memory. Thus by removing context, any One element of memory can be compared to All elements of memory or as One and All.